The title is a bit deceiving: rather than an overt comparison of religion to aliens, it is a comparison of the fanaticism from zealots of religion, to that of the fanaticism from zealots of the alien culture. It’s a bit of a challenge being an observer of this scenery (the alien culture): most of what is available for knowledge or for entertainment or for reinforcement is unsubstantiated; a large portion of that is completely fabricated. Regardless of personal experiences and knowledge, some people fabricate stories to strengthen the case for aliens and extraterrestrial existence.
True believers don’t need fakery to enhance their perception or understanding of these things: they know what they believe. But there is a type of person in existence that will try to persuade others to believe their beliefs at any cost. Perhaps it is to prove a point; maybe it is to rationalize their personal beliefs; maybe for comfort; maybe because they have an axe to grind, but whatever the reason, it exists.
It makes it hard for those who are true believers and want to find out more information and gain the respect of the scientific and mainstream communities, as they are discredited every time a new hoax comes out or another story is disproven. Every time that a bad youtube video comes out or a lie is perpetuated through local resources the task gets tougher to convince others that aliens do exist.
These zealots would have the mainstream believe that what they portray is real; but in reality, they don’t make money per se, or gain fame necessarily, they simply want to show people that which cannot be denied. But the truth is out there, and with the far reaching avenues like the internet available to the public, it is not both easier to share “alien experiences” and have them disproven regardless of what really happened.
Invariably a good hoax will be disproven at some point, as the technology now has finite limitations and access to this technology exists everywhere. It is not the same as catching a fuzzy figure on 8mm tape in the late 1970’s or an unclear 110 exposure on camera of a series of lights in a dark sky, or even several eyewitness accounts. Now if you fake something, the digital signature sometimes is enough to give you away. Even with incredible planning, some part of the story is bound not to match up, and a fake account will be exposed to discrediting. Cell phone cameras have so much more capability than even the best commercial cameras did 15 years ago; video has lost the ability to be manipulated without telltale signs of editing. In all, there is not as much leeway to make something staged as it was some years ago. Truth seekers have availability to technologies to debunk hoaxes.
There have been many instances of videos that look real, and seem legit, but have inaccuracies or awkward poorly thought out premises and concerns. What little hope they bring to an alien culture enthusiast or firsthand believer, is quickly removed when they stark reality and the element of doubt creeps in because someone behaved like an amateur.
For example: a video is floating around about a Siberian alien found in the snow and it is awkwardly realistic. But the setting and the obvious filming mistakes make it easily recognizable as a hoax. The man filming, makes a sweep to his friend and then a much farther sweep all the way in the opposite direction. He then essentially picks up a dark spot in the snow many yards ahead of his position and zooms in on it to reveal that it is an alien body. Two seconds of camera time on his friend, then immediately to a figure in the snow some distance and then he zooms in on it to reveal that it is a very intact Alien body half buried in the snow and ice. He then focuses on the alien for one minute more and the video ends. And the holder of the camera uploads it to youtube without contacting authorities and figuring out what else he can do to prove that the “alien” is actually that: an alien? No follow up to show the body removed, or to prove that it is anything more than a latex casting of a well thought out alien resembling puppet. Certainly it has a believable subject, as the alien is quite a specimen, but the unrealistic “chance” capturing of it on video when he pans straight to it and zooms in, makes it much less reasonable. No substantiation videos to prove that it wasn’t just a staged piece of footage, no back story to speak of, and not full removal of the body to show that it is hardened and stiff from the ice, or that it is real in its natural movements or composition.
This is just one example, and certainly cannot be proven easily to be real or fake, but it certainly seems unrealistic. Such a find if real, would certainly warrant a further more detailed investigation of the capturing of video to support it.
This is just one example of an unfair piece of “evidence” which falls flat in the argument that aliens do exist. It simply distances the truth that much farther from the audience it seeks to persuade. When someone actively perpetuates an alien encounter of any kind that is not truthful, it weakens the core of evidence in existence, and it makes fools of those who champion it in its early stages, such that their credibility outside of the internet forums of believers is nonexistent.
One day we as believer all hope that the truth comes out in an inexcusable and unchallengeable way, but we should not lower ourselves to fabrications to gain momentum or believers, it’s unnecessary and only hurts the cause. The truth will one day be undeniable. Will you be one who can hold their head up high to say “I told you so!” without having resorted to fakery?



Mankind has always wondered if he was alone in the universe and throughout the history of man; there have been incidents and discoveries that make believers out of many that there is indeed ancient proof of aliens over the centuries.